The growing popularity of online gay-friendly adverts in China shows business is waking up to the “pink yuan” and more liberal attitudes among young people, but the government remains unmoved.
China’s gay economy is worth US$300 billion to US$500 billion annually, reaching about 70 million people, marketing research firm Daxue Consulting said, making it the biggest gay and transgender market in the world in terms of population.
“Young Chinese people do appear to be opening up and accepting LGBT+ culture,” said Allison Malmsten, a China analyst at the Shanghai-based company. “The LGBT+ market in China has a lot of untapped potential.”
Homosexuality has been legal in China since 1997 and the nation’s largest organization for psychiatrists stopped classifying it as a mental disorder in 2001.
However, same-sex marriage is not recognized and most LGBT+ people fear coming out to their families because of stigma.
An online advert showing a man bringing his partner home to celebrate the Lunar New Year with his family last month went viral across China, sparking positive responses among the LGBT+ community for helping break taboos in the conservative country.
The video by China’s Alibaba Group, which specializes in e-commerce sites, is part of a growing trend, largely led by technology firms targeting millennials aged 23 to 38, and gay and trans consumers, industry and LGBT+, analysts said.
“Many of these companies have young consumers and showing inclusivity simply makes an ad memorable,” Malmsten said. “Look at the buzz created from the Alibaba advert — netizens and media spreading the advertisement all over, and at no extra cost for the company.”
Internet search giant Baidu, e-commerce company Dangdang and ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing have also promoted LGBT+ friendly adverts in the past few years.
The government often censors news, TV shows and films that touch on LGBT+ issues in the name of “family values,” while media companies self-censor, gay rights activists have said.
China scrubbed at least 10 scenes with gay references from 2018’s Oscar-winning biopic Bohemian Rhapsody about British musician Freddie Mercury.
“If we want to achieve a friendly and inclusive social environment, we need much more LGBTQ images on TV and in newspapers for [help] changing the law and social norms,” Yi Yang of the China Rainbow Media Awards said.
“LGBTQ+ issues are becoming more and more invisible,” said Yi, whose organization works to improve gay and trans coverage.
However, companies looking to carve out a slice of the country’s pink economy must tread carefully. Subtlety is key.
“These ads, for the most part, do not outright voice support for same-sex couples, rather include them as an element in advertisements being accepted by others,” Malmsten said.
A Cathay Pacific Airways advert that showed a same-sex couple holding hands on a beach was last year banned in a government-run airport and metro stations in Hong Kong, which has been rocked by months of pro-democracy protests.
The ban was later reversed after an online backlash by LGBT+ activists, local media reported.
Social media is harder to police, leading to a trickle of gay-friendly online adverts that target a specific audience.
China in 2017 banned online content showing “abnormal” behaviors — including homosexuality — to promote “socialist values” and to assert the Chinese Communist Party’s control over online discussions in the traditionally Confucian society.
One microblogging site banned gay content in 2018, but it was forced to reverse its decision within days after an outcry among pro-LGBT+ Chinese, using hashtags, open letters and even calling on people to dump shares of the company.
In a sign of changing attitudes, the Chinese National People’s Congress last year said that introducing same-sex marriage was one of the most popular requests made by people.
While no new legislation was outlined, the statement raised hopes of reform among LGBT+ Chinese in a year when Taiwan became the first nation in Asia to allow same-sex marriage.
Popo Fan (范坡坡), a Chinese filmmaker and LGBT+ activist based in Berlin, said that the effects of pro-gay online content were limited in China, as it often only reached young, well-
educated, tech-savvy people on high incomes.
“Those advertisements are only targeting people who can buy or use the Internet and smartphones,” he said.
“A lot of people don’t have this access and they have no opportunity to get any [LGBT+] information,” he added.
While pro-gay adverts can help to challenge taboos, China is far from accepting or legalizing same-sex relationships, said Suki Chung (鍾明麗), an LGBT+ rights campaigner at Amnesty International.
And many companies were simply riding the “pride bandwagon” of LGBT+ marketing, without having genuinely inclusive policies toward sexual and gender minorities, she said in Hong Kong.
“LGBTI marketing ads will become a growing trend in the greater China region, given the lucrative pink dollars and the look-good image of being a ‘social change maker’ or pioneer,” she said.
“Real change is still far away given that the Chinese government still imposes tight controls ... but the power of online netizens and LGBTI communities in fighting back against the government propaganda is strong,” she added.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations