Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is the spiritual leader of the Taiwan Action Party Alliance, which was established in August, and he is No. 6 on the party’s legislator-at-large list.
This takes me back to 2009, when I dropped by a post office in Queens, New York, to mail a parcel to Taiwan, and came across a middle-aged man with Asian looks who asked me in Chinese if I was from Taiwan. When I nodded, he said that he was, too, and then started criticizing the political situation in Taiwan.
He believed that interference from Chen’s wife, Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍), led to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) failure at the time, saying: “How could the head of a company be allowed to bring his laptop to the president’s residence to brief Wu? And the most ridiculous thing is that Wu even stored NT$100 million [US$3.31 million at the current exchange rate] in cash in the basement of Yuanta Bank.”
When I said: “These are just rumors,” he surprised me by saying: “You stupid Chen fan! Even Chen himself admitted to having deposited NT$700 million overseas and still you defend the Chen family.”
He went on to criticize major DPP figures at the time — vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) and premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), as well as former premiers Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and Yu Shyi-kun— saying that they fought over the party’s presidential nomination, but that none of them shouldered any blame when the party lost the 2008 presidential election.
He told me how a young woman with limited political experience — a reference to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) — had needed to take over the DPP and how, as party chairperson, she had needed to cover the cost of the year-end dinner for party employees out of her own pocket, in addition to relying on small donations to repay its NT$170 million debt.
He was worried that it would be difficult for the DPP to make a comeback and left the post office still mumbling about the NT$700 million damaging the DPP. It made me understand how overseas Taiwanese worry about their home country.
I was also reminded of a news broadcast in which Chen’s daughter, Chen Hsing-yu (陳幸妤), said that the overseas money was “excess campaign funds” to be used as “nation-building funds,” and asked rhetorically: “Is there anyone in the DPP who has not taken any money from my dad?”
When I joined the Taiwan Association of University Professors in 2000, then-chairman Huang Tsong-le (黃宗樂) told me that the association had run out of funds and could no longer pay the NT$40,000 monthly office rent. To raise money, Huang and top association members went to see independence advocate Koo Kwang-ming (辜寬敏).
Having stammered out the reason for their visit, they were surprised when he humbly and generously said: “No problem. The Koo family’s money is deposited with us by Taiwanese. If you need money, just take it.”
Koo then wrote a check. It was only when Huang left Koo’s house that he scrutinized the check — Koo had given them NT$500,000, eliminating the association’s financial crisis.
The Chen family did not run a business like the Koo family did. Nor did the Chen family sell their land like Taiwanese democracy pioneer Huang Hsin-chieh (黃信介) did to finance the DPP in the elections.
Consequently, the campaign funds cannot be regarded as the Chen family’s money, but money deposited with the family by Taiwanese out of trust. The Chen family should, for example, put those political contributions into a corporate account or a foundation so that the funds can truly be used as “nation-building funds.”
Sophia Lee is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.